ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Rapid On-Site-Evaluation (ROSE) with an in-room pathologist (ROSE-P) has been shown to improve the diagnostic yield of specimens obtained from patients undergoing Endoscopic Ultrasound fine needle aspiration or biopsy (EUS-FNAB) of pancreatic lesions. Recently, there has been an increased interest and utilization of Telecytology (ROSE-T) to optimize clinical workflows, and to address social distancing mandates created during the COVID-19 pandemic. The purpose of this study is to compare diagnostic outcomes of ROSE-P and ROSE-T. METHODS: A single center cohort study of patients who underwent EUS-FNAB of solid pancreatic lesions with ROSE was conducted. The primary outcome was overall diagnostic yield of cancer. All patients who underwent EUS-FNA were entered into a prospectively maintained database. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive statistics and univariate analysis. RESULTS: There were 165 patients in each arm. There was no difference in diagnostic yield between ROSE-P and ROSE-T (96.4% vs 94.5%, p=.428). ROSE-T was associated with increased use of 22-gauge needles (p=.006) and more needle passes (p<.001). There was no significant difference in age, gender, lesion size, needle type, procedure times, or adverse events between the two groups (p<.05 for all). There were more pancreatic tail lesions sampled in the ROSE-P group (p<.001). CONCLUSION: Rapid on-site evaluation using Telecytology was not associated with any difference in final histologic diagnosis for EUS-FNAB of solid pancreatic masses. This has important implications for optimizing clinical workflows.
ABSTRACT
Interstitial lung disease and associated fibrosis occur in a proportion of individuals who have recovered from severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection through unknown mechanisms. We studied individuals with severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) after recovery from acute illness. Individuals with evidence of interstitial lung changes at 3 to 6 months after recovery had an up-regulated neutrophil-associated immune signature including increased chemokines, proteases, and markers of neutrophil extracellular traps that were detectable in the blood. Similar pathways were enriched in the upper airway with a concomitant increase in antiviral type I interferon signaling. Interaction analysis of the peripheral phosphoproteome identified enriched kinases critical for neutrophil inflammatory pathways. Evaluation of these individuals at 12 months after recovery indicated that a subset of the individuals had not yet achieved full normalization of radiological and functional changes. These data provide insight into mechanisms driving development of pulmonary sequelae during and after COVID-19 and provide a rational basis for development of targeted approaches to prevent long-term complications.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Extracellular Traps , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , Neutrophils , LungABSTRACT
Introduction Some observational studies have demonstrated the benefit of famotidine in COVID-19-infected individuals. The preference of using an H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) over proton pump inhibitors (PPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been questioned by clinicians. Aim To compare the outcomes of hospitalized patients who were taking H2RA vs. PPI. Material and methods We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted for COVID-19 infection from 1 March until 31 July 2020. We included 396 patients admitted during the study period. Of the total, 39 (9.8%) received H2RA and 86 (21.7%) were taking PPI as home medications;6 patients were taking both H2RA and PPI. Results The baseline characteristics and comorbid conditions were similar in both groups. The mean age was 57.79 ±17.36 years, 43.2% were female, and 48.7% were Caucasian. The common comorbid conditions included HTN (56.8%), obesity (44.4%), diabetes mellitus (38.6%), and coronary artery disease (30.1%). Smoking was more prevalent in the PPI group (42.5% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.03). Gastrointestinal symptoms were seen on initial presentation in 31.1%, and 43.9% had elevated liver enzymes. The H2RA group had similar mortality (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.35–2.05) to the non-H2B group. It remained non-significant as compared to PPI (HR = 0.34–3.19, 95% CI: 0.34–3.19). The secondary outcomes including readmission, ICU admission, and severe COVID infections (including ARDS and thromboembolism) were similar in these groups. Conclusions The H2 receptor antagonist used as a home medication did not show benefit over the PPI in patients admitted for COVID-19 infections.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Some observational studies have demonstrated the benefit of famotidine in COVID-19-infected individuals. The preference of using an H2 receptor antagonist (H2RA) over proton pump inhibitors (PPI) during the COVID-19 pandemic has been questioned by clinicians. Aim: To compare the outcomes of hospitalized patients who were taking H2RA vs. PPI. Material and methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients admitted for COVID-19 infection from 1 March until 31 July 2020. We included 396 patients admitted during the study period. Of the total, 39 (9.8%) received H2RA and 86 (21.7%) were taking PPI as home medications; 6 patients were taking both H2RA and PPI. Results: The baseline characteristics and comorbid conditions were similar in both groups. The mean age was 57.79 ±17.36 years, 43.2% were female, and 48.7% were Caucasian. The common comorbid conditions included HTN (56.8%), obesity (44.4%), diabetes mellitus (38.6%), and coronary artery disease (30.1%). Smoking was more prevalent in the PPI group (42.5% vs. 18.2%, p = 0.03). Gastrointestinal symptoms were seen on initial presentation in 31.1%, and 43.9% had elevated liver enzymes. The H2RA group had similar mortality (HR = 0.84, 95% CI: 0.35-2.05) to the non-H2B group. It remained non-significant as compared to PPI (HR = 0.34-3.19, 95% CI: 0.34-3.19). The secondary outcomes including readmission, ICU admission, and severe COVID infections (including ARDS and thromboembolism) were similar in these groups. Conclusions: The H2 receptor antagonist used as a home medication did not show benefit over the PPI in patients admitted for COVID-19 infections.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIMS: More than 100 million people to date have been affected by the coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Patients with COVID-19 have a higher risk of bleeding complications. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of COVID-19 patients with signs and symptoms of acute gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB). METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out for articles published until until November 11, 2020, in the Embase, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. We included studies on COVID-19 patients with signs and symptoms of GIB. RESULTS: Our search yielded 49 studies, of which eight with a collective 127 patients (86 males and 41 females) met our inclusion criteria. Conservative management alone was performed in 59% of the patients, endoscopic evaluation in 31.5%, and interventional radiology (IR) embolization in 11%. Peptic ulcer disease was the most common endoscopic finding, diagnosed in 47.5% of the patients. Pooled overall mortality was 19.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]; 12.7%-27.6%) and pooled mortality secondary to GIB was 3.5% (95% CI; 1.3%-9.1%). The pooled risk of rebleeding was 11.3% (95% CI; 6.8%-18.4%). CONCLUSION: The majority of COVID-19 patients with GIB responded to conservative management, with a low mortality rate associated with GIB and the risk of rebleeding. Thus, we suggest limiting endoscopic and IR interventions to those with hemodynamic instability and those for whom conservative management was unsuccessful.